What Interval Characteristics Make a Good Categorical Disease Assessment Scale?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
What difference does ("good") HRM make?
The importance of human resources management (HRM) to the success or failure of health system performance has, until recently, been generally overlooked. In recent years it has been increasingly recognised that getting HR policy and management "right" has to be at the core of any sustainable solution to health system performance. In comparison to the evidence base on health care reform-related ...
متن کاملGood Agreements Make Good Friends
When starting a new collaborative endeavor, it pays to establish upfront how strongly your partner commits to the common goal and what compensation can be expected in case the collaboration is violated. Diverse examples in biological and social contexts have demonstrated the pervasiveness of making prior agreements on posterior compensations, suggesting that this behavior could have been shaped...
متن کاملWhat does a professionalism assessment scale measure?
Klemenc-Ketis and Vrecko described the development and validation of a professionalism assessment scale for medical students in a recent issue of this journal.1 In the introduction to this article they state that ‘professionalism can be defined as a collection of attitudes, values, behaviours and relationships that act as the foundation of the health professional’s contract with society’. Subse...
متن کاملWhat Makes a Good Molecular-Scale Computer Device?
The lithographically-produced CMOS transistor has been the key technology that has enabled the information revolution. However, in the near future the limitations, both technical and economic, introduced by lithographic fabrication may inhibit further decreases in feature size. Chemically assembled electronic nanotechnology (CAEN) is a promising alternative to CMOS for constructing circuits wit...
متن کاملGood fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why
Bayesian reasoning, defined here as the updating of a posterior probability following new information, has historically been problematic for humans. Classic psychology experiments have tested human Bayesian reasoning through the use of word problems and have evaluated each participant's performance against the normatively correct answer provided by Bayes' theorem. The standard finding is of gen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Phytopathology®
سال: 2014
ISSN: 0031-949X,1943-7684
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-10-13-0279-r